The French Lebanese GM, Bachar Kouatly, once commented on how ugly my chess style was. Hopefully it has improved a bit in this respect (especially with my ever greater leaning towards positional play) but there may still be a lot of truth to what he said. I’d like to reply with Nimzovitsch’s remark that the beauty of chess lies not in a move’s appearance but rather the thought behind it, but when you see a game by Capablanca, Rubinstein, Smyslov, Karpov or Kramnik there is often an aesthetic appeal beyond this.
Of course an ugly style of play does not prevent one from being effective, and there may even be a case that ugly chess is MORE effective than the aesthetically pleasing variety because the only reason for playing that way would be the results. Lasker played ugly chess but was World Champion for 27 years whilst Viktor Korchnoi’s games would not win many prizes for grace or elegance.
Similarly you can find some ugly martial arts styles, the uglies of which may well be Yiquan. It has no form and littleĀ grace, but the originator, Wang Xiangzhai, was one of the top fighters in China.
Here’s a clip from a Yiquan tournament. Ugly, really ugly.
Nigel,
Good God my friend, your chess game and style is unique to you as is every chess player who ventures forth with those testy pawns or Knight.
Tonight I discovered that my latest column is on Google popular site. I guess mentioning my topic drew inquisitive minds!
Best to you, I love your chess and analysis.
Don
By: kindredspiritks on June 26, 2009
at 12:25 am
Don,
Don’t get me wrong, I’m not ashamed of my less than beautiful chess style as I know there are many more ’stylish’ players that would have little chance against me. There’s an important point I was trying to make about ‘aesthetics’ being largely unrelated to efficacy.
With chess it’s most important to have good visualisation skills at the moment of crisis, and this is what decides victory or defeat. Overall strength is, broadly speaking, a function of this.
Nigel
By: Nigel Davies on June 26, 2009
at 7:23 am
Nigel,
W………….e……….l….l maybe that is why I have so many ups and downs! I beat a master or better one game and then lose to a class C or B the next so I stay level. Anyway I sometimes find myself overlooking the obvious when engrossed in thinking up a cool scheme! I am guilty of not paying sufficient attention to what the opponent is likewise cooking up for me.
Don
By: kindredspiritks on June 26, 2009
at 7:21 pm
Don,
As Frank Marshall pointed out, attention trumps concentration!
Nigel
By: Nigel Davies on June 27, 2009
at 7:20 am
Nigel,
It’s like my trading style as of late…..crude, but effective. Not very pretty but it works.
Jeff
By: masteroftheuniverse on June 29, 2009
at 1:40 am
Jeff,
That’s got me wondering if an aesthetic sense is a good way to hobble one’s trading. British GM Tony Miles used to deliberately play positions which ‘looked’ much worse than they actually were because he thought people overestimated their chances when taking the other side.
I’ve seen one trading concept that involves multi-coloured moving averages of different lengths on a screen. It looks beautiful – like a rainbow – but of course it’s about as much use as an inflatable dartboard. Except perhaps in showing that this effect may exist amongst many market participants.
Nigel
By: Nigel Davies on June 29, 2009
at 5:06 am
‘It’s not the way you look but what’s inside that counts!!!’
I suppose too many people put too much emphasis on looks and don’t think about other things.
‘Looks can be deceiving!’
‘Never judge a book by its cover!’
‘The Ugly Duckling turned into the beautiful Swan!’ Many chess moves can too!
There are many sayings in literature that comment on looks and warn not to judge people or things by the way they look. If it works it works!
If we are talking about Chess than looks has nothing to do with it…I’ve seen a lot of ugly people in tournament halls win competitions and some good looking people! Moves play a different game as nobody really understands chess, and if they say they understand chess 100% then they don’t understand chess. So a lot comes down to Philosophy and temperament…I suggest people play the moves they feel happiest about even if they do look ugly – it may just turn into a Swan!
‘Once a player realises that they will always be a beginner that is when they become the Master.’
That saying shouldn’t be taken literally but it holds enough meaning for me to say that when anybody realises that they will always be a beginner they can begin learning and avoid bias views, this makes them stronger without actually learning anything new. People who think that they have Mastered anything are the people who run stale and stop growing and learning.
Ironically in boxing looks go a long way, when they say someone is an ‘Ugly fighter’ it often means that they are MEAN and BRUTAL, they bring blood into the ring.
By: noddyfischer on June 29, 2009
at 1:17 pm
I suppose your chess moves could be called ‘The Ugly Duckling of chess!’
Philosophy goes a long way!
By: noddyfischer on June 29, 2009
at 1:20 pm